imnot_likeyou: ([sam] well -yeah-)
Sam Winchester ([personal profile] imnot_likeyou) wrote 2011-02-05 10:13 pm (UTC)

Because there's no such thing? Or at least in that time period.

[a beat]

Actually, a woman's virginity was held in much higher regard back then. It was essentially a symbol of her status. If she was still a virgin, she was much more likely to be able to marry up as oppose to down. No one cared if a guy was a virgin.

But that goes back to the whole "turning women into property thing" that most feminists don't like.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting